PROMO All information available in the news
$
Select Payment Method
Personal Info

Credit Card Info
This is a secure SSL encrypted payment.

Notice: Credit Card fields are disabled. Please connect and configure your Stripe account to accept donations.

Donation Total: $100.00

By handing over to “Gambling” No. 12/2013 eight -page text on video cards, we naively believed that we will finish testing the latest fee and finally rest. Yeah, now. They just sent everything to the printing house – calls rained down. First, AMD reported on her readiness to send Radeon R9 290, and then NVIDIA suggested testing the new flagship – GTX 780 Ti. There was nowhere to go, they returned everyone back, gathered a stand and rushed into battle.

If you missed

Did not read our review and did not understand what we were talking about? It doesn’t matter, now we’ll tell you everything. The main topic was as follows: AMD released a new generation of Radeon R video cards. Moreover, she presented not one or two board, as is usually the case, but at once there are seven samples, most of which we got to the editor and compared with competitors from NVIDIA.

In fact, it turned out that part of the new products is the renamed and thoroughly cheaper Radeon HD 7000 series, and there are only two really fresh chips-the top R9 290 and the top-ends and R9 290x. The latter then we tested and made sure that in speed it is close to GTX 780 , But the second did not work out – he arrived a little later, at about the same time with the GTX 780 Ti, the eldest of GeForce, designed to show AMD, who is the host in the house.

AMD Radeon R9 290

We will start with R9 290. In the Radeon hierarchy, she stood a step below R9 290X, retaining all the clan features of the flagship. Inside – a slightly cut crystal Hawaii. The number of stream processors decreased from 2816 to 2560 units, and texture – from 176 to 160 pieces. Falled and frequency of work. Instead of 1000 MHz, the maximum for R9 290 became 947 MHz. The rest remained untouched.

So, the number of rasterization blocks is 64 and, in theory, promises decent FPS in high resolutions. This is also indicated by video memory: 4 GB GDDR5 at 512-bit tire and speed of 5 GHz.

No lagging behind R9 290 and in terms of supported technologies. There is AMD Trueaudio-this is a separate DSP critical that can calculate sound effects in games and operate with such variables as the distance to the sound source and materials of obstacles that are found on the path of obstacles. Immediately, the support of the API Mantle, its own AMD engine, which, while in words, should increase performance in a number of games. Last month, work with Mantle said only Dice , promising an appropriate update for Battlefield 4 , However, by the time of writing these lines, they managed to join it Rebellion Entertainment ( Sniper Elite V3 ), Cloud Imperium Games ( Star Citizen ) And Eidos montreal ( Thief ).

Note that the R9 290 is positioned unusual. Initially, the card was planned to be released in peak GeForce GTX 770 , But after NVIDIA sharply threw off prices for GTX 780, AMD decided to compete with the last. For this, the company slightly rebuilt the algorithms of the operation of energy conservation and cooling systems.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Rumors went about the imminent appearance of the GTX 780 Ti when we still did the last issue of our magazine. Then everyone wondered where Nvidia would put this card, because the difference between the GTX 780 and GTX Titan and so was scanty. It turned out that everything was simple. The novelty did not squeeze "between", but settled "above". Yes, you understand correctly – GTX 780 Ti is older and, clean on paper, faster than GTX Titan.

Our hero is based on a full -fledged chip GK110 With architecture Kepler. And this means 15 SMX blocks, 2880 streaming nuclei and 240 texture processors. For comparison: in the GTX Titan one of the SMX was blocked, the card could boast of 2688 CUDA criteria and 224 TMU. Well, GTX 780 generally lived with a dozen SMX, 2304 computing and 192 texture units.

More fun in 780 Ti and with frequency indicators. Standard for "Stone" – 875 MHz, and in Turbo Boost 2 mode.0 – 928 MHz. Recall that Titan shows 836-876 MHz, respectively, and GTX 780-863-900 MHz.

From memory there is also an increase. GDDR5 GTX 780 Ti functions at an effective frequency of 7000 MHz, not at 6000 MHz, like Titan. True, the latter has 6 GB at this speed, and the GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB.

If we compare a beginner with R9 290X, in many parameters, the AMD creation will be more interesting. So, the volume of GDDR5 in R9 290x-4 GB, and let them work at 5000 MHz, but are tied not to 384-, but to a 512-bit tire. There are more “red” and rasterization blocks responsible for the direct formation of pixels: 64 versus 48 ROP for NVIDIA.

But what AMD is noticeably inferior to NVIDIA is in energy efficiency. The consumption of GTX 780 Ti is declared at 250 W, and in R9 290x it is estimated at 290 watts. It would seem a trifle, but for the full day of the game GTX 780 Ti saves kilowatts of energy and five rubles. It is necessary to remember about the cold disposition of NVIDIA GK100. In the work, it heats up to a maximum of 80 ° C and thanks to this under the GPU Boost 2.0 stably holds a frequency of 1000 MHz. Radeon R9 290X These numbers are given at a temperature of 95 ° C and a fan twisted to the maximum.

Appearance

It's funny, but also AMD Radeon R9 290, and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti outwardly copy their closest relatives. At the Reds, the map is covered with a black casing with strips diverging in a circle, and in NVIDIA – a metal cover with a transparent window. Similar to competitors and cooling systems. Crystals live under powerful radiators with a base in the form of a evaporative chamber. And from active cooling in both – one cylindrical turntable working in the manner of a turbine.

AMD parity with NVIDIA and in terms of connectors. For the output of the image, each of the beginners has a pair of DVI and according to a full -sized HDMI with DisplayPort. Well, for food, the boards were detained 6- and 8-pin sockets.

Testing

So as not to be bored, they called the entire existing top to the company. From the side of Nvidia looked at the light GTX Titan , GTX 780 , GTX 770 And double GTX 690. And only from AMD came only Radeon R9 290x.

They fell into a cozy environment – in the insides of a powerful computer Meijin. You can read about it in the insert in the neighborhood, and for now we will explain how it happened at all and where is our own stand. The fact is that just a couple of days before the sharp activation of Nvidia and AMD, our veteran with Core i7-920 on board was sent to a well-deserved pension, and fresh forces did not manage to approach at that time. As a result, I had to strain our connections and cause temporary reinforcement. By the way, in addition to the computer, it also included a new 3DMark , Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0 , Unitine Valley 1.0 , Tomb Raider , Aliens vs. Predator , Hitman: Absolution , Bioshock Infinite , Metro: Last Light And Crysis 3.

Results

The test was divided into two parts. At first, out of an old habit, we drove away all our guests on an ordinary Full HD monitor and … were, to put it mildly, surprised. The new GTX 780 Ti went around the GTX 780 by only 11%, and Titan managed to overtake only 2%. For the board just created, it was unacceptable. Fortunately, the company saved us from writing a devastated outcome IIYAMA , The 27-inch panel sent to the test stand XB2776QS With a resolution of 2560×1440 (you can read about it on the neighboring pages).

Despite the apparent small difference with 1920×1080, the XB2776QS pixels are 1.8 times more, and this is a serious gland blow-almost all our experimental ones sank by about 30-40%. And here it became clear which board is cooler.

It was comfortable to play in 2560×1440 only GTX 780 Ti, GTX Titan, GTX 690 and, of course, Radeon R9 290X. The latter, I must say, generally showed herself well done. After updating the drivers, she learned to work stably at a frequency of 1 GHz and, accordingly, added well in performance, managing not only to overtake the GTX 780, but also approach GTX 780 Ti.

No lagging behind and R9 290. In 1920×1080, it is almost indistinguishable from the GTX 780, and in 2560×1080, thanks to the expanded set of ROP, it even overtakes it by 5%, despite the fact that officially the chip is noticeably cheaper than the competitor and in this parameter is more closer to the GTX 770, which is 15-20% weaker.

Well, as for the most important thing, I gave everyone a double GTX 690. Let it be not much, but it is faster and GTX 780 Ti and R9 290x. GTX 780 Ti went forward in a single -chip competition, the AMD flagship by 7%.

As with tests, the result of our work we will divide into two parts. In the first, say the following. Full HD era for cards manufacturers seemed to end. Permission can no longer load the board, and because of this a very funny situation is formed. That you buy GTX 770 for 11,000 rubles, that you take the GTX 780 Ti for 25,000 – the result is approximately the same: stable 30 FPS provide both chips. Yes, perhaps, the younger representative has to sacrifice the level of anti-aliasing somewhere, but this almost does not affect the final quality.

Another thing is the resolution of a new generation. Here, seriously, in 2560×1440 the games are literally not recognized. And let the picture in the amount of useful information, but the increased density of dots per inch makes itself felt. The image turns out to be incredibly clear: the "ladders" almost completely disappear along the edges of the objects, and the contours look like they were neatly circled with a thin brush. Naturally, to see all this, you have to pay well for iron. And here the issue of choice is much sharper.

If you rely on official prices, then AMD products look preferable. R9 290 for 14,000 rubles pulls almost all games in 2560×1440. The only problem is that in our stores this card costs an average of 21,000 rubles, and this is when the GTX 780 is easily taken for 18,500. The same situation with Radeon R9 290x: on paper – 19,990 rubles, in fact – at least 24,000.

Plus, compared to GeForce, AMD creations turned out to be very loud. If the NVIDIA boards are almost inaudible under load, then Radeon sometimes howls so that at least the ears plug it. However, you should not completely write off AMD from accounts. We are sure that in a month or two prices are stabilized, and third-party manufacturers will come up with quiet cooling systems.

Well, as for our hero today – GTX 780 Ti – then we will say the following. This is the new king of graphics that squeezed the GTX Titan throne. And, it's nice, it costs cheaper than the old flagship: 26,000 versus 32,000 rubles. If you are ready to spend so much on a video card – do not hesitate, take.

Test stand

We have a computer as a test stand Meijin GTX 780 Ti Sli. It is assembled in the well -known body to us Silverstone Fortress FT02B-W USB 3.0 Black with a 90 degree of the motherboard.

The basis for the filling was ASUS P9X79 Pro On the chipset Intel X79 Express. She was inserted into the LGA2011 socket of LGA2011 Intel Core i7-4960x a frequency of 3.6 GHz. Four rally planks helped him Hynix-1 CL11 DDR3-1600 MHz 8 GB each.

All this worked under control Windows 8 Pro 64 Bit , Installed on a solidocurrency Intel 520 with a volume of 240 GB, and was powered by a kilowatte PSU Cooler Master V1000 RS-A00-AFBA-G1-EU.

Table 1.

Test stand

CPU

Intel Core i7-4960X Extreme Edition (Sandy Bridge-E, Socket LGA2011, 3.6-4 GHz, L3-Cash 15 MB)

Cooling

Scythe SCMG-3PCGH MUGEN 3

Motherboard

ASUS P9X79 PRO (ATX, Intel X79 Express, Socket LGA2011, 8x DDR3-1066/1333/1600/1800/2400 MHz to 64 GB, 4x PCIe 3.0 x16, 2x PCIE 2.0 x1, 4x SATA Rev. 3, 4x SATA 2, RAID 0, 1, 5, 10; 4x USB 3.0, 6x USB 2.0, 2X Esata Rev. 3, Lan, Bluetooth, S/PDIF-OUT, Audio)

Memory

4x 8 GB CL11 DDR3-1600 MHz Hynix-1 CL11

Solid -state drive

240 GB Intel 520 (reading – 550 MB/s, recording – 520 MB/s)

Hard drive

3 TB Seagate ST3000DM001 (SATA Rev. 3, 7200 rpm, 64 MB)

Optical drive

ASUS BW-16D1HT (SATA, CD-ROM/RW, DVD-ROM/RAM, DVD ± RW, DL, BD-ROM/R/RE, DL)

Sound card

Asus Xonar Phoebus

power unit

Cooler Master V1000 RS-A00-AFBA-G1-EU, 1000 W

Frame

Silverstone Fortress FT02B-W USB 3.0 Black

Additionally

Windows 8 Pro 64 Bit, cardrider, Video Catch Poem AverMedia Live Gamer HD

NVIDIA drivers

331.65/331.70

AMD drivers

Catalyst 13.11 beta9

Table 2.

Synthetic tests

3dmark (Firestrike Extreme)

Graphics

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

5114

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

4925

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

5733

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

4520

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

3588

AMD Radeon R9 290x

4 899

AMD Radeon R9 290

4 702

Physics

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

16 038

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

16 041

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

15 881

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

16 029

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

16 025

AMD Radeon R9 290x

13 896

AMD Radeon R9 290

13 838

Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

4986

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

4808

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

5306

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

4455

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

3492

AMD Radeon R9 290x

5 058

AMD Radeon R9 290

4 587

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

96%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

106%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

89%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

70%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

101%

AMD Radeon R9 290

92%

Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0

Fps

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

58.4

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

53.2

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

64.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

51.4

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

37.2

AMD Radeon R9 290x

53.6

AMD Radeon R9 290

50.3

Scores

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

1471

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

1339

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

1626

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

1294

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

938

AMD Radeon R9 290x

1351

AMD Radeon R9 290

1266

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

91%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

111%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

88%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

64%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

92%

AMD Radeon R9 290

86%

Unitine Valley 1.0

Fps

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

66.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

63.8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

77.7

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

60.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

46.4

AMD Radeon R9 290x

59.8

AMD Radeon R9 290

56.9

Scores

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2786

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

2669

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

3250

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

2536

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

1928

AMD Radeon R9 290x

2502

AMD Radeon R9 290

2380

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

96%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

117%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

91%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

69%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

90%

AMD Radeon R9 290

85%

Table 3

Game tests

Aliens vs. Predator (DX11)

Veryhigh, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AA 2X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

113.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

108.4

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

138.3

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

101.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

80.8

AMD Radeon R9 290x

114.6

AMD Radeon R9 290

107.4

Veryhigh, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AA 4X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

98.8

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

89.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

112.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

86.5

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

64.9

AMD Radeon R9 290x

105.8

AMD Radeon R9 290

95.1

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

93%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

118%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

88%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

69%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

104%

AMD Radeon R9 290

95%

Veryhigh, 2560×1440, AF 16X, AA 2X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

71.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

66.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

83.3

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

60.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

48.6

AMD Radeon R9 290x

74.1

AMD Radeon R9 290

67.2

Veryhigh, 2560×1440, AF 16X, AA 4X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

61.2

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

56

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

69.4

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

53

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

39.5

AMD Radeon R9 290x

66.2

AMD Radeon R9 290

60.5

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

93%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

115%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

86%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

67%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

106%

AMD Radeon R9 290

97%

Tomb Raider

High, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AA 2X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

56.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

60.8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

77.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

55.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

43.9

AMD Radeon R9 290x

54.4

AMD Radeon R9 290

52.3

High, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AA 4X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

51.2

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

48.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

62

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

44.8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

36.1

AMD Radeon R9 290x

46.5

AMD Radeon R9 290

32.9

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

101%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

130%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

93%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

75%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

94%

AMD Radeon R9 290

79%

High, 2560×1440, AF 16X, AA 2X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

44.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

37.7

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

36.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

AMD Radeon R9 290x

37.4

AMD Radeon R9 290

33.9

High, 2560×1440, AF 16X, AA 4X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

34.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

29.4

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

28.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

AMD Radeon R9 290x

29.9

AMD Radeon R9 290

26.8

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

85%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

83%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

AMD Radeon R9 290x

85%

AMD Radeon R9 290

77%

Hitman: Absolution

Ultra, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AA 4X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

67.8

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

64.2

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

79.5

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

61.2

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

48.1

AMD Radeon R9 290x

75.2

AMD Radeon R9 290

71.8

Ultra, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AA 8x

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

49.2

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

45.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

54.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

43.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

31.8

AMD Radeon R9 290x

54.1

AMD Radeon R9 290

52.5

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

94%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

94%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

115%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

90%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

68%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

111%

AMD Radeon R9 290

106%

Ultra, 2560×1440, AF 16X, AA 4X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

46

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

43.7

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

52

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

40.5

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

30.9

AMD Radeon R9 290x

52.9

AMD Radeon R9 290

50.1

Ultra, 2560×1440, AF 16X, AA 8x

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

48.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

27.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

33.5

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

26.7

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

18.8

AMD Radeon R9 290x

39.5

AMD Radeon R9 290

35.6

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

76%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

91%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

71%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

53%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

98%

AMD Radeon R9 290

91%

Bioshock Infinite

Ultradx11, 1920×1080, AF 16X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

105.8

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

104

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

112.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

96.2

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

81.4

AMD Radeon R9 290x

91.1

AMD Radeon R9 290

87.5

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

98%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

107%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

91%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

77%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

86%

AMD Radeon R9 290

83%

Ultradx11, 2560×1440, AF 16X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

72.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

69.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

83.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

62.7

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

49.8

AMD Radeon R9 290x

60.6

AMD Radeon R9 290

58.4

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

95%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

114%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

86%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

69%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

83%

AMD Radeon R9 290

80%

Metro: Last Light

Veryhight, 1920×1080, AF 16X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

47.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

44

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

49

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

41

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

32

AMD Radeon R9 290x

45

AMD Radeon R9 290

42

Veryhigh, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AdV. Physx

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

42.4

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

37

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

41

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

35

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

28

AMD Radeon R9 290x

29

AMD Radeon R9 290

27

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

90%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

84%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

66%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

82%

AMD Radeon R9 290

76%

Veryhigh, 2560×1440, AF 16X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

31

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

27

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

32

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

25

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

20

AMD Radeon R9 290x

29

AMD Radeon R9 290

26

Veryhigh, 2560×1440, AF 16X, ADV. Physx

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

27

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

25

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

29

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

22

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

19

AMD Radeon R9 290x

20

AMD Radeon R9 290

18

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

90%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

105%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

81%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

67%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

84%

AMD Radeon R9 290

76%

Crysis 3

Max, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AA 4X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

53.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

51.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

60.8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

47.5

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

37.9

AMD Radeon R9 290x

47.6

AMD Radeon R9 290

41.5

Max, 1920×1080, AF 16X, AA 8x

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

44.6

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

40.5

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

49.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

37.3

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

29.5

AMD Radeon R9 290x

36.2

AMD Radeon R9 290

31.6

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

93%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

112%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

86%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

68%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

85%

AMD Radeon R9 290

74%

Max, 2560×1440, AF 16X, AA 4X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

33.5

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

31.3

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

38.9

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

29

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

23.4

AMD Radeon R9 290x

33.7

AMD Radeon R9 290

29.1

Max, 2560×1440, AF 16X, AA 8x

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

26.4

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

23.1

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

24.3

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

11.2

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

15.1

AMD Radeon R9 290x

26.4

AMD Radeon R9 290

22.4

%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

91%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

106%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

67%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

64%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

100%

AMD Radeon R9 290

86%

Table 4.

Price/performance ratio (games)

Performance (1920×1080)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

95%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

113%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

89%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

71%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

94%

AMD Radeon R9 290

86%

Performance (2560×1440)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

88%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

106%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

79%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

64%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

93%

AMD Radeon R9 290

84%

Price (retail)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

100%

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

135%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

131%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

71%

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

48%

AMD Radeon R9 290x

92%

AMD Radeon R9 290

81%

Table 5.

Technical Super Nova sister sites characteristics

The core

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GK110

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

GK110

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

2x GK104

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

GK110

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

GK104

AMD Radeon R9 290x

Hawaii

AMD Radeon R9 290

Hawaii

The number of transistors

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

7.1 billion

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

7.1 billion

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

2x 3.54 billion

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

7.1 billion

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

3.54 billion

AMD Radeon R9 290x

6.2 billion

AMD Radeon R9 290

6.2 billion

Process process

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

28 Nm

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

28 Nm

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

28 Nm

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

28 Nm

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

28 Nm

AMD Radeon R9 290x

28 Nm

AMD Radeon R9 290

28 Nm

The number of stream processors

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2880 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

2688 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

2x 1536 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

2304 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

1536 pcs.

AMD Radeon R9 290x

2816 pcs.

AMD Radeon R9 290

2560 pcs.

The frequency of the graphic nucleus

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

875-928 MHz

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

836-876 MHz

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

915-1019 MHz

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

863-900 MHz

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

1046-1085 MHz

AMD Radeon R9 290x

up to 1000 MHz

AMD Radeon R9 290

up to 947 MHz

Type, memory volume

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GDDR5, 3 GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

GDDR5, 6 GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

GDRR5, 4 GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

GDDR5, 3 GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

GDDR5, 2/4 GB

AMD Radeon R9 290x

GDDR5, 4 GB

AMD Radeon R9 290

GDDR5, 4 GB

Memory frequency

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

7000 MHz

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

6008 MHz

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

6008 MHz

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

6008 MHz

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

7000 MHz

AMD Radeon R9 290x

5000 MHz

AMD Radeon R9 290

5000 MHz

Data tire

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

384 bits

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

384 bits

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

2x 256 bits

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

384 bits

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

256 bits

AMD Radeon R9 290x

512 bits

AMD Radeon R9 290

512 bits

The number of texture blocks

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

240 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

224 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

2x 128 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

192 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

128 pcs.

AMD Radeon R9 290x

176 pcs.

AMD Radeon R9 290

160 pcs.

The number of rasterization blocks

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

48 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

48 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

280 mm

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

48 pcs.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

32 pcs.

AMD Radeon R9 290x

64 pcs.

AMD Radeon R9 290

64 pcs.

Energy consumption

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

250 watts

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

250 watts

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

300 watts

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

250 watts

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

230 watts

AMD Radeon R9 290x

AMD Radeon R9 290

Interface

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PCIE X16 3.0

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

PCIE X16 3.0

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

PCIE 3.0 x16

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

PCIE X16 3.0

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

PCIE 3.0 x16

AMD Radeon R9 290x

PCIE X16 3.0

AMD Radeon R9 290

PCIE X16 3.0

Price for December 2013 (retail)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

26,000 rubles

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

35,000 rubles

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

34,000 rubles

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

18 500 rubles

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

12 500 rubles

AMD Radeon R9 290x

24,000 rubles

AMD Radeon R9 290

21,000 rubles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *